enquiries@rodlaird.co.uk »
Freephone 0800 612 0910
Freefax 0800 612 0920
Now taking bookings
Bookmark and Share

Issues in survey sampling (30 Oct 12)

Why persistence can give you less bias and more objectivity


It is impossible to get a representative spread of answers unless you start with a good sample design and follow it up to get a good response rate.

Like to read more or make a comment? Log in or register below



Why not join the discussion!

Or even better still offer your own advice and tell us about things that others can learn from.

We moderate comments lightly so bear with us and we'll get your thoughts listed as soon as we can.

You must be logged in to post comments.

Not registered yet? Simply fill in the box below.

Email
Password
Forgotten your password?

Like to have access to this and hundreds of other articles like it? Register now!

Just pop your details in the form below, and you'll have full access to our library as well as receiving the free articles you have requested.

Research and evaluation
Resident involvement
Community involvement
Patient involvement
Communications & marketing
Equality and diversity
Community safety
All of these
Your work email

Already subscribed? Want to manage your account? »

Log in

New?

Register now to benefit from hundreds of free hints, tips, articles and interviews

Your email address:

Contact us»

Latest Twitter updates

Other articles you might like:

A beginners guide to calculating sampling error

A beginners guide to confidence levels

ANOTHER task in sampling!

Answers to the sampling task

Can we have faith in the numbers? Issues in survey sampling

Flow sampling – Here’s something for you to think about

Flow sampling: an essential way to learn what people think of your service at the very best time - just after they use it

Simple techniques to help you obtain a reliable sample

Size is not everything

The absolute essentials of survey sampling

Well, is size everything?

Weighting to correct for non-response

Why persistence can give you less bias and more objectivity